Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL): How Does It Affect Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers?

  • Rani Rizka Ramdani Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Kana Hidayati Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Keywords: mathematics education, pre-service teachers, Technology-Enhanced Learning

Abstract

The rapid advancement of ICT has fundamentally reshaped the educational landscape, creating a critical need for educators to be proficient in technology integration. This study investigates the influence of Technology-Enhanced Learning on the professional development of pre-service mathematics teachers, focusing on its impact on their teaching competencies and overall readiness. This research employs a systematic literature review, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Twenty-six relevant articles published between 2017 and 2025 were identified from six academic databases for in-depth analysis. The findings were categorised into cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. The results reveal that TEL significantly enhances PMTs' cognitive abilities, such as conceptual understanding, problem-solving, and reasoning skills, while also improving motivation, self-efficacy, and confidence in the affective domain. In the psychomotor domain, it develops essential technical competencies, creativity, and readiness for technology-based teaching. In conclusion, integrating TEL is pivotal for modern teacher education programs. It not only equips future mathematics teachers with the necessary 21st-century skills but also fosters a positive disposition towards technology in the classroom. Future research should conduct empirical studies to explore the pedagogical potential of emerging technologies for strengthening digital literacy, creativity, and pedagogical innovation among pre-service mathematics teachers.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Açikgül, K. (2020). The Effect of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Game Activities Supported Micro-Teaching Practices on Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Perception. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 13(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.13.2.11

Aiym, Y., Galiya, K., Ademi, B., Adilet, M., Kamshat, Z., & Gulmira, K. (2022). Development of the logical thinking of future mathematics teachers through the use of digital educational technologies.

Akçay, A. O. (2024). Case Studies: Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Integration of Technology into Instructional Activities Using a Cognitive Demand Perspective. 16(1).

Aytekin, C., & Kiymaz, Y. (2019). Teaching Linear Algebra Supported by GeoGebra Visualization Environment. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 12(2), 75–96.

Barak, M. (2014). Closing the Gap Between Attitudes and Perceptions About ICT-Enhanced Learning Among Pre-service STEM Teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9446-8

Baya’a, N. F., Daher, W. M., & Anabousy, A. A. (2019). The Development of In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Integration of ICT in a Community of Practice: Teaching-in-Context Theory. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(01), 125. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i01.9134

Bruna, C. E. R. (2025). Student Perceptions and Beliefs on the Use of Digital Technologies from an Innovation Experience in an Introductory Linear Algebra Course. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(2), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.2.2237

Bwalya, A., & Rutegwa, M. (2023). Technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy of pre-service science and mathematics teachers: A comparative study between two Zambian universities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), em2222. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12845

Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2023). Can flipped classroom pedagogy offer promising perspectives for mathematics education on pandemic-related issues? A systematic literature review. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55(1), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01388-w

Dereje, E. W., Mulugeta, A., & Mulugeta, W. (2023). Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Geometric Reasoning Skills with Technology-Integrated Guided Inquiry Approach. Pedagogical Research, 8(4).

Dockendorff, M., & Zaccarelli, F. G. (2025). Successfully preparing future mathematics teachers for digital technology integration: A literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(5), 948–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2024.2309273

Eshetu, D., Atnafu, M., & Woldemichael, M. (2022). The effectiveness of guided inquiry-based technology integration on pre-service mathematics teachers understanding of plane geometry. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202215241

Fitrah, M., Setiawan, C., Widihastuti, W., Sofroniou, A., Azizatur Rahmawati, N., Arina, A., Ratna Sari, S., & Iskandar, I. (2025). Impact of Learning Management Systems and Digital Skills on TPACK Development Among Pre-service Mathematics Teachers. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(1), 504–518. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1392

Kansiime, G., & Batiibwe, M. S. K. (2023). Adoption of online mathematics learning in Ugandan government universities during the COVID-19 pandemic: Pre-service teachers’ behavioural intention and challenges. Discover Education, 2(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00035-0

Karjanto, N., & Acelajado, M. J. (2022). Sustainable Learning, Cognitive Gains, and Improved Attitudes in College Algebra Flipped Classrooms. Sustainability, 14(19), 12500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912500

Kereluik, K., & Mishra, P. (2011). On Learning to Subvert Signs: Literacy, Technology and the TPACK Framework. 42(2).

Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404

Koyunkaya, M. Y., & Dede, A. T. (2024). Using different digital tools in designing and solving mathematical modelling problems. Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), 19035–19065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12577-3

Kreis, Y., Haas, B., Weinhandl, R., & Lavicza, Z. (2024). Transitioning from lectures to online flipped classrooms: Enhancing pre-service teacher education in Luxembourg. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2425895

Kukul, V. (2024). Should I use digital storytelling in my future classroom? Why or why not? Investigating pre-service math teachers’ acceptance of digital storytelling. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231156173

Kul, U., Aksu, Z., & Birisci, S. (2019). The Relationship between Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Web 2.0 Self-Efficacy Beliefs. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2019.01.014

Kul, Ü., Çelik, S., & Artvin Coruh University, Artvin, Turkey, sedefcelik@artvin.edu.tr. (2018). Investigating Changes in Mathematics Teachers’ Intentions Regarding Web 2.0 Technology Integration. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.11.2.8

Kutluca, T. (2017). Views of Mathematics Teacher Candidates about the Technological Tools That Can Be Used in Mathematics Lessons. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 321–330.

Lampang Rajabhat University, Lampang, Thailand, Jun-on, N., Suparatulatorn, R., Kaewkongpan, D., & Suwanreung, C. (2022). Enhancing Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ Technology Integrated Competency: Cooperative Initiation and Open Lesson Observation. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(12), 1363–1373. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.12.1760

Li, Y., Garza, V., Keicher, A., & Popov, V. (2019). Predicting High School Teacher Use of Technology: Pedagogical Beliefs, Technological Beliefs and Attitudes, and Teacher Training. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9355-2

Liu, C.-C., Wang, D., Gu, X., Hwang, G.-J., Tu, Y.-F., & Wang, Y. (2025). Facilitating pre-service teachers’ instructional design and higher-order thinking with generative AI: An integrated approach with the peer assessment and concept map. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2025.2474528

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002

Patkin, D., & Plaksin, O. (2019). Procedural and relational understanding of pre-service mathematics teachers regarding spatial perception of angles in pyramids. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2018.1480808

Philemon, N. M., Chibisa, A., & Mabusela, M. S. (2022). Acceptance of the GeoGebra Application in Learning Circle Theorems. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(12), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.12.1

Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., De La Cruz-Campos, J.-C., Campos-Soto, M.-N., & Ramos-Navas-Parejo, M. (2023). Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Primary Education: The Role of ICT-A Systematic Review of the Literature. Mathematics, 11(2), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020272

Simsek, M., & Yazici, N. (2021). Examining the Digital Learning Material Preparation Competencies of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 323–343.

Suparatulatorn, R., Jun-on, N., Hong, Y.-Y., Intaros, P., & Suwannaut, S. (2023). Exploring problem-solving through the intervention of technology and Realistic Mathematics Education in the Calculus content course. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp103-128

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Uygun, T., Sendur, A., Dere, R., & Ozcakir, B. (2023). Development of TPACK with Web 2.0 Tools: Design-Based Study. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 445–465.

Walters, L. M., Green, M. R., Goldsby, D., & Parker, D. (2018). Digital Storytelling as a Problem-Solving Strategy in Mathematics Teacher Education: How Making a Math-eo Engages and Excites 21st Century Students. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 2(1), 1–16.

Zambak, V. S., & Tyminski, A. M. (2017). A Case Study on Specialised Content Knowledge Development with Dynamic Geometry Software: The Analysis of Influential Factors and Technology Beliefs of Three Pre-Service Middle Grades Mathematics Teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(1), 82–106.

Zengin, Y. (2019). Development of mathematical connection skills in a dynamic learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2175–2194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09870-x

Published
2026-05-30
How to Cite
Ramdani, R., & Hidayati, K. (2026). Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL): How Does It Affect Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers?. JURNAL EKSAKTA PENDIDIKAN (JEP), 10(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol10-iss1/1046

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.