A Comparison of Science Education between Germany, China and Indonesia

  • Ardi Ardi Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Azwar Ananda Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Rusdinal Rusdinal Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Nurhizrah Giastituati Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Fauziah Hervi Universitas Negeri Padang
Keywords: Comparison, Science Education, Indonesia, Germany, China

Abstract

The development of a science-based society is strongly influenced by science education. The comparison of science education between Germany, China and Indonesia is an interesting topic because they have different traditions and approaches to developing their science education systems. This research aims to study the differences in science education in Germany, China and Indonesia. This research will compare science education between the three countries through several aspects, such as curriculum, teaching methods, teacher training, educational infrastructure, challenges and opportunities, and philosophical basis. The secondary data used in this research is obtained from reliable sources. The results show that the science education system in Germany is highly organised and focuses on an in-depth understanding of concepts. In contrast, science education in China is highly competitive, and academic achievement is prioritised. Science education in Indonesia tries to combine concept understanding and practical skills. However, implementation and assessment still need to be improved. Thus, a comparison of science education in Germany, China and Indonesia shows differences in curriculum, teaching methods, teacher training, educational infrastructure, opportunity challenges and philosophical basis. Each country has advantages and disadvantages. By thoroughly understanding science education in these countries, we can find many lessons that can be used to improve the science education system. Collaborative efforts and exchange of experiences between these countries will help improve science education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cahyati, D., Hariri, H., & Hermanto Karwan, D. (2021). Women’s Leadership in Higher Education: Barriers and Opportunities in Indonesia. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 17(9). http://journals.sfu.ca/ijepl/index.php/ijepl/article/view/939
Chen, W. (2022). Transportation Infrastructure and Family Educational Expectations: An Empirical Analysis Based on the China Family Panel Survey. Best Evidence in Chinese Education, 12(2), 1643–1651. https://doi.org/10.15354/bece.22.ab017
Chris, H. (2018). Doing a Literature Review. Sage Publications, Inc.
Dilber-Özer, Z., & Baysal, Z. N. (2022). Learning places, teaching methods, techniques and materials used in General Studies (Sachunterricht) lessons by teachers in German primary schools' third grade. Education 3-13, 50(7), 934–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1926527
Doğan, M., & Saraç, M. (2022). Redefining Classroom Management in Hybrid Education Setting from the Perspectives of EFL and German Language Instructors. International Journal of Asian Education, 3(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v3i2.285
Ergenc, C. (2020). An Action Research on Teaching in Multicultural Classrooms at Joint-venture Universities in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 00(00), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1788506
Fahrudin, F., Ansari, A., & Ichsan, A. S. (2021). Pembelajaran Konvensional dan Kritis Kreatif dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Islam. Hikmah, 18(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.53802/hikmah.v18i1.101
Fatimaningrum, A. S. (2012). Manajemen Kurikulum Pendidikan Dasar di China. Seminar Nasional Diseminasi Shortcourse Bermutu Dikti, 1–10.
Haji, E., Kiyai, B., & Pombengi, J. D. (2011). Peran Pemerintah Daerah dalam Mewujudkan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Pendidikan (Suatu Studi di Sekolah Menengah Atas). Media Neliti.
Lee, R. M., & Yuan, Y. (Selena). (2018). Innovation Education in China: Preparing Attitudes, Approaches, and Intellectual Environments for Life in the Automation Economy. In Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (p. 93). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0
Li, B., Sjöström, J., Ding, B., & Eilks, I. (2022). Education for Sustainability Meets Confucianism in Science Education. Science and Education, 32(4), 879–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00349-9
Li, J., Wiemann, K., Shi, W., Wang, Y., & Pilz, M. (2019). Vocational Education and Training in Chinese and German Companies in China: a ‘Home international’ Comparison. International Journal of Training and Development, 23(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12151
Liu, L. (2023). Opportunities and Challenges for Private Education in China: A Review of the Latest Policy Revisions. ECNU Review of Education, 6(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221120829
Liu, N., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2017). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Biology Lessons between China and Germany: A Video Study. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(3), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9797-6
Maryanti, R., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2021). Curriculum Development in Science Education in Vocational School. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 1(3), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajsee.v1i3.38429
Melanoma. (2019). Penulisan Karya Tulis Ilmiah dengan Studi Literatur. Open Science Framework, 1–3.
Muhtadi, A. (2008). Studi Komparatif Sistem Pendidikan di Jerman dan Korea Selatan. In Dinamika Pendidikan (Issue 2, pp. 76–93).
OECD. (2018). Pendidikan di Indonesia Belajar dari Hasil PISA 2018. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang KEMENDIKBUD, 021, 1–206. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/16742
Ohlssen, M., & Krempecki, L. (2020). Developing and Sustaining High-Quality Special Education Infrastructures. National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools. https://www.proquest.com/reports/developing-sustaining-high-quality-special/docview/2488228334/se-2?accountid=13042%0Ahttp://oxfordsfx.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/oxford?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&genre=report&sid=ProQ:ProQ%3Ae
Prihantoro, C. R. (2015). The Perspective of Curriculum in Indonesia on Environmental Education. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2014.915
Pujiastuti, S. I., Schwarz, M., & Holodynski, M. (2021). Socialisation Goals of Preschool Teachers for Moral Education: A Cross-Cultural Comparison between Urban Contexts of Germany and Indonesia. Early Child Development and Care, 191(3), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2019.1621307
Putra, A. (2017). Mengkaji dan Membandingkan Kurikulum 7 Negara (Malaysia, Singapura, Cina, Korea, Jepang, Amerika dan Finlandia). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 1–21.
Rohman, A. (2013). Pendidikan Komparatif, Dasar-Dasar Teori Perbandingan Pendidikan Antar Bangsa. Aswaja Pressindo.
Sari, D. S. (2017). Comparison of Education Concept in Indonesia with Germany: Analysis Of Science Learning System. Prosiding Seminar Nasional III Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, September, 769–778.
Sariyatun, Joebagio, H., & Akhyar, M. (2018). Teachers' perception of digital teaching material development in social science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special Issue), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10252a
Setiani, I. (2021). Perkembangan Pendidikan dan Hubungannya dengan Pendidikan Guru Sains di Beberapa Negara. Skripsi, IAIN Ponorogo.
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2021). Correction to: The Bildung Theory—From von Humboldt to Klafki and Beyond. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_33
Syakhrani, A. W., Bahrianti, Dewi, Mahmudah, & Rahmadina, E. (2022). Sistem Pendidikan di Negara China. Adiba: Journal of Education, 2(3), 413–420.
Tang, T., Aldhaeebi, M. A., Lan, J. Q., & Bamanger, E. (2020). Comparison of the Graduate Education between Canada and China. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(4), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p13
Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015 (Indonesia’s PISA Results in 2018 are Lower than 2015). Open Science Framework, 2(January), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8Q9VY
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2003). Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Yang, X., Schwarz, B., & Leung, I. K. C. (2021). Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ Professional Modeling Competencies: A Comparative Study between Germany, Mainland China, and Hongkong. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10064-x%0APre-service
Yin, H. (2013). Implementing the National Curriculum Reform in China: A Review of the Decade. Frontiers of Education in China, 8(3), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-002-013-0023-3
Zhang, L., & Diao, P. (2023). Teaching Quality Management of Physical Education, especially in China and Ukraine. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(2), 1051–1058. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.24090
Published
2024-05-28
How to Cite
Ardi, A., Ananda, A., Rusdinal, R., Giastituati, N., & Hervi, F. (2024). A Comparison of Science Education between Germany, China and Indonesia. JURNAL EKSAKTA PENDIDIKAN (JEP), 8(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol8-iss1/806

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.