Analisis Soal Ujian Biologi Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill Berbasis Daring Selama Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Sekolah Menengah Atas

  • Mohammad Mulyadi Prasetyo Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi, PMIPA, STKIP Pembangunan Indonesia Makassar
  • Nurhidayah Nurhidayah Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi, FKIP, Universitas Muslim Maros
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol5-iss2/614
Keywords: Analysis, HOTS, Online, Pandemic, Question

Abstract

This research is a descriptive study where data is collected with the aim of knowing the characteristics and obtaining information about the Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) type of Final Exam questions. The subject of this research is the Biology Final Semester Examination for the 2020/202 Academic Year. This research has two stages, namely: Preparation and implementation stage to obtain documents in the form of school exam questions. Research data were collected through: (1) Problem Analysis, Researchers, biology education lecturers, and biology teachers analyzed each question from 3 characteristics that were fulfilled in each item, namely indicators consisting of stimulus, critical thinking skills, and solving abilities. problem. (2). Carry out FGD (Focus Group Discussion) to determine whether each item is included in the type of stimulus, critical thinking ability, and problem solving ability. (3) Tabulate the data for the results of the analysis of each question number. then the results of the analysis are tabulated on each indicator. The results obtained in this study are almost all HOTS type questions (95%), on the characteristics of almost all items (94.2%) in accordance with the provisions of competency achievement indicators. On the stimulus indicator, all HOTS type questions have a stimulus. Where "half" of the HOTS questions is stimulated by pictures, "less than half" is stimulated by case fragments and a small portion is stimulated by diagrams, tables, and examples. In critical thinking indicators, 91.86% of the "almost all" categories of HOTS questions have critical thinking characteristics, in addition that "a small part" (26.23%) of HOTS questions have problem solving characteristics including problem solving questions with indicators of identifying problems, identifying non-conforming problems, and solving problems based on data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L.W. Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk: Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Arsyad, A. (2004). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta Selatan: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Arti, E. P. N., & Hariyatmi. (2015). Kemampuan Guru Mata Pelajaran Biologi Dalam Pembuatan Soal HOT (Higher OrDer Thinking) di SMA Negeri 1 Wonosari Klaten. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 16 (2).

Facione, P. A. (2015). Permission to Reprint for Non-Commercial Uses Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, 5 (1), 1-28.

Hariyatmi, & Luthfia, A. R. (2020). Profil Soal Ulangan Biologi SMA di Kecamatan Kartasura Dari Perspektif Hots. Artikel Pemakalah Paralel, 2016.

Idris, I. S., Bahri, A., & Putriana, D. (2018). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Melalui PBL. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi.

Kemdikbud. (2020). Strategi dan Kebijakan Ditjen Dikti Terhadap Keberlanjutan Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia dalam Hadapi Pandemi Covid-19. Www.Kemdikbud.Go.Id.

Kunandar. (2015). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Pesrta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Lailly, N. R., & Wisudawati, A. W. (2015). Analisis Soal Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) dalam Soal UN Kimia SMA Rayon B Tahun 2012/2013. Kaunia: Integration and Interconnection Islam and Science, 11 (1).

Nawawi, S. (2016). Potensi Model Pembelajaran Challenge Based Learning dalam Memperdayakan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1(1), 27-39.

Oktaviani, K. S. (2017). Bentuk Tes Objektif dan Kecemasan Pada Pembelajaran Membaca Huruf Hiragana Bahasa Jepang. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 8 (1), 50-56.

Qurniati, D., Andayani, Y., & -, M. (2015). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 58-69.

Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2011). Learning in the Age of Web 2.0: A Roundup of Innovative Practices in Europe [Apprendre à l’heure du Web 2.0: Portrait de pratiques innovantes en Europe]. Futuribles: Analyse et Prospective, 379.

Rosidah. (2013). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran POGIL Berbantuan Lembar Kegiatan Peserta Didik (LKPD) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Skripsi Jurusan Mate matika, FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Ruhimat, M. (2018). Kompetensi Pembuatan Instrumen Pengukuran Hasil Belajar Oleh Guru IPS SMP Di Kota Bandung. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 21 (2), 176-187.

Sani, R. A. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis HOTS (Higher OrderThinking Skills). Kota Tangerang: TSmart.

Sartika, & Erni Munastiwi. (2019). Peran Guru Dalam Mengembangkan Kreativitas Anak Usia Dini Di TK Islam Terpadu Salsabila Al-Muthi’in Yogyakarta. Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 4 (2), 35-50.

Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., Kaniawati, I., No, J. S., Keguruan, F., & Bengkulu, U. (2018). Model Higher Order Thinking Virtual Laboratory : Model Praktikum Fisika Berbasis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Eksakta, 3 (5).

Subadar. (2017). Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter (PPK) Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Jurnal Pedagogik, 04 (01), 81-93.

Subagia, I. W., & Wiratma, I. G. L. (2016). Profil Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 5(1), 39-54.

Susiaty, U. D., & Oktaviana, D. (2019). Analisis Kebutuhan Instrumen Tes Berdasarkan Revisi Taksonomi Bloom Untuk Mengukur Higher Order Thinking Skills Siswa. Proceedings of the 1st ICOLED – IKIP-PGRI Pontianak.

Suswina, M. (2016). Hasil Validitas Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Bergambar Disertai Peta Konsep Untuk Pembelajaran Biologi SMA Semester 1 Kelas XI. Ta’dib, 14 (1). 44-51.

Wakhidah, N. (2018). Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 8 (2), 150-160.

Widana, I. W. (2017). Higher order Thinking Skills Assessment (HOTS). Jisae: journal of Indonesian Student Assesment and Evaluation, 3 (1), 32-44.

Zein, M. (2016). Peran Guru dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Inspiratif Pendidikan, 5 (2), 274-285.

Zhang, Q., Li, M., Wang, X., & Ofori, E. (2019). Dr. Edgar Dale. TechTrends, 63(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00395-1

Zubaedi. (2011). Desain Pendidikan Karakter. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53 (9).

Published
2021-11-30
How to Cite
Prasetyo, M., & Nurhidayah, N. (2021). Analisis Soal Ujian Biologi Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill Berbasis Daring Selama Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Sekolah Menengah Atas. JURNAL EKSAKTA PENDIDIKAN (JEP), 5(2), 128-134. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol5-iss2/614
Issue
Vol 5 No 2 (2021): JEP (Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan)
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2021 Mohammad Mulyadi Prasetyo, Nurhidayah Nurhidayah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.